These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659575)
61. Ruling on consent: protection for patients and doctors. Dyer C BMJ; 1989 Feb; 298(6670):348-9. PubMed ID: 11644407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion. Asaro A Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution. Reilly PR Q Rev Biol; 1987 Jun; 62(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 3299450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy. Mitchell MJ Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Re Eve. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Law lords give reasons for their decision on consent. Dyer C BMJ; 1989 Jun; 298(6687):1542. PubMed ID: 11644411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore. Gauvey SK; Shuger NB Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Matter of Moe. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Parts of China forcibly sterilizing the retarded who wish to marry. Kristof ND N Y Times Web; 1991 Aug; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Abortion: the father's lack of standing. Caldwell JL N Z Law J; 1988 May; 1988(5):165-9. PubMed ID: 11659132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Constitutional law--Maryland circuit courts have parens patriae jurisdiction to authorize guardians to consent to sterilization of incompetent minors when the procedure is medically necessary. Eisner LJ Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1982; 11(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 11658447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Virginia's sterilization law: what should be done about it? Hall SC Va Bar News; 1980 Apr; 28(10):17-21. PubMed ID: 11658468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Sparkman v. McFarlin. 23 Mar 1977. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1977; 552():172-6. PubMed ID: 11646070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. The right to parenthood. Wright PA Fam Law Rev; 1979; 2(3):173-85. PubMed ID: 11665242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Legal implications of sterilization of the mentally retarded. Dowben C; Heartwell SF Am J Dis Child; 1979 Jul; 133(7):697-9. PubMed ID: 12085865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]