388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659603)
1. Alzheimer's: decisions in terminal care.
Cassel CK; Hays JR; Lynn J
Patient Care; 1991 Nov; 25(18):125-37. PubMed ID: 11659603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legislative trends in nonjudicial surrogate health care decision making.
Vignery B
Clgh Rev; 1989; 23(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 11653878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decisionmaking at the end of life: patients with Alzheimer's or other dementias.
Francis LP
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):539-92. PubMed ID: 15119319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care directives for the elderly.
Urbanyi M; Molloy DW; Lever JA
Can Fam Physician; 1992 Oct; 38():2357-61. PubMed ID: 11652225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study.
Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Innovative legislative initiatives: the New Jersey Declaration of Death and Advance Directives for Health Care Acts.
Armstrong PW; Olick RS
Seton Hall Legis J; 1992; 16(1):177-97. PubMed ID: 11653079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Struggle.
Miller P
Bioethics Forum; 1997; 13(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 11655072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Shared decision making: the ethics of caring and best respect.
Beltran JE
Bioethics Forum; 1996; 12(3):17-25. PubMed ID: 11660305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A time to live, a time to die: advance directives and living wills.
Mitchell CB; Whitehead MK
Ethics Med; 1993; 9(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 11652738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
White PD
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws develops Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act.
Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 11657359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality.
Wilson PH
Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Durable power of attorney for health care: a better choice.
Garraty CM
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):115-41. PubMed ID: 11653116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The limits of advance directives: a history and assessment of the Patient Self-Determination Act.
Larson EJ; Eaton TA
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1997; 32(2):249-93. PubMed ID: 11657436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Using advance directives in the home-care setting.
Markson L; Steel K
Generations; 1990; 14(Suppl. 1990):25-8. PubMed ID: 11651068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
