481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659618)
1. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
Poole EK
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
Muller RJ
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy.
Brown JP
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guardianship and the IVF human embryo.
Kasimba P; Buckle S
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1989; 17():139-52. PubMed ID: 11659316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications.
Wurmbrand MJ
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal status of the embryo.
Andrews LB
Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Frozen embryos: a need for thawing in the legislative process.
Davidoff BE
SMU Law Rev; 1993; 47(1):131-64. PubMed ID: 11652686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Social values in a brave new world: toward a public policy regarding embryo status and in vitro fertilization.
Dickman DG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):817-51. PubMed ID: 11649208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Davis v. Davis: what about future disputes?
Feliciano T
Conn Law Rev; 1993; 26(1):305-53. PubMed ID: 11660034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Solomon decision: a study of Davis v. Davis.
Eget MM
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1113-28. PubMed ID: 11651437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of laws surrounding in vitro fertilization.
Andrews LB
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 8(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 11659385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
Hemphill L
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law.
Smith GP
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
Robertson JA
Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
