293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659626)
1. From control over one's body to control over one's body parts: extending the doctrine of informed consent.
Perley SN
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 May; 67(2):335-65. PubMed ID: 11659626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
Howard JJ
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
Healey JM; Dowling KL
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):989-1005. PubMed ID: 11651440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The commercialization of human tissue -- the source of legal, ethical and social problems: an area better suited to legislative resolution.
O'Connor JJ
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(1):115-69. PubMed ID: 11659354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.
Prowda JB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1995 Aug; 77(8):611-39. PubMed ID: 11658094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bailment and donation of parts of the human body.
Brahams D
New Law J; 1989 Jun; 139(6411):803-4. PubMed ID: 11650943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
Bobinski MA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a right to fetal tissue transplantation?
Morgan GL
Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1991; 10(2):129-56. PubMed ID: 11659574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
Pellegrino ED
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human experimentation and human rights.
Katz J
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation of drug treatments for HIV and AIDS: a contractarian model of access.
Salbu SR
Yale J Regul; 1994; 11(2):401-53. PubMed ID: 11660141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
LoBiondo AR
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic information and property theory.
Barrad CM
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 87(3):1037-86. PubMed ID: 11656395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent: defining limits through therapeutic parameters.
Daar JF
Whittier Law Rev; 1995; 16(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 11660487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent.
Riga P
Linc Law Rev; 1977; 10(2):159-95. PubMed ID: 11662665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
