These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

762 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659634)

  • 1. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parental notification and public policy.
    Diamond EF
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
    Byrne TJ
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
    Stuhlbarg SF
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Crutchfield CF
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute.
    Czarnecki MS
    Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion--an update.
    Guthman HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical decision making for children: an analysis of competing interests.
    Ewald LS
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Oct; 25(4):689-733. PubMed ID: 11658427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.