232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659635)
1. Competence to consent to electroconvulsive therapy.
Martin BA; Bean GJ
Convuls Ther; 1992 Jun; 8(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 11659635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.
Meisel A; Roth LH
Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The regulation of electroconvulsive therapy in California: the impact of recent constitutional interpretations.
Whitcomb D
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1989; 18(2):469-94. PubMed ID: 11659134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):241-51. PubMed ID: 11654519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electroconvulsive therapy: politics and practice in Ontario.
Martin BA
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1987 May; 20(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 11658844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent and the mental patient: California recognizes a mental patient's right to refuse psychosurgery and shock treatment.
Zwerdling ZE
Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):725-59. PubMed ID: 11663585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Competence to consent to treatment as a psychological construct.
Tepper AM; Elwork A
Law Hum Behav; 1984 Dec; 8(3-4):205-23. PubMed ID: 11659145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed decision-making capacity: a patient's ability to participate in treatment determinations.
Tepper AM; Kaslow FW
Law Psychol Rev; 1981; 6():49-67. PubMed ID: 11658373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment.
Allan A; Allan M
S Afr Law J; 1997; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Shock therapy and informed consent.
Gilbert DT
Ill Bar J; 1981 Jan; 69(5):272-278, 287. PubMed ID: 11658617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to refuse treatment in New Jersey.
Perlin ML
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11662299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Guardianship of Ingram.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 11644500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent.
Edwards L
Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulatory pressures hamper the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy.
Johnson SY
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():155-70. PubMed ID: 11659924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal issues in determining competence to make treatment decisions.
Benesch K
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1989; No. 41():97-105. PubMed ID: 11659187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking.
Simpson RE
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 76(1):172-207. PubMed ID: 11658361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to refuse electroconvulsive therapy.
Ellis JW
Ment Hyg; 1975; 59(2):5. PubMed ID: 11664485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Organ donation by psychiatric patients: a case report.
Zibin T; Nevett D; O'Croinin F; Garbharran H
Hum Health Care Int; 1996 Nov; 12(4):177-8. PubMed ID: 11660297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent and the right to refuse or participate.
Frese FJ
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 11653325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consent to electroconvulsive therapy: investigation of the validity of a competency questionnaire.
Martin BA; Glancy GD
Convuls Ther; 1994 Dec; 10(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 7850398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
