320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659653)
1. Are you my mother? A judge's decision in in vitro fertilization surrogacy.
Seavello SF
Hastings Womens Law J; 1992; 3(2):211-44. PubMed ID: 11659653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
Lieber KB
Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements.
Goodwin A
Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism.
Brandel A
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
Birck ML
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who is mother? Genetic donor, not surrogate.
Blodgett N
ABA J; 1986 Jun; 72():18. PubMed ID: 11658871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary.
Davis AD
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
O'Brien S
Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parental rights and the definition of motherhood in surrogate motherhood.
Rae SB
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 3(2):219-77. PubMed ID: 11660411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogate law: the decision in a novel case in New Jersey could have wide-reaching implications for infertile couples and surrogate motherhood.
Galen M
Natl Law J; 1986 Sep; 9(3):1, 8, 10. PubMed ID: 11658784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: medicolegal aspects of a new technique to create a family.
Annas GJ; Elias S
Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(2):199-223. PubMed ID: 11658509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
Bernat E; Straka U
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
Field M
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
