These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659736)

  • 1. The creation and perpetuation of the mother/body myth: judicial and legislative enlistment of Norplant.
    Henley M
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):703-77. PubMed ID: 11659736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
    Mertus J; Heller S
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Norplant: the new scarlet letter?
    Flannery MT
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crime, race, and reproduction.
    Roberts DE
    Tulane Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 67(6):1945-77. PubMed ID: 11652259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother.
    Young ME
    Marriage Fam Rev; 1995; 21(3-4):259-81. PubMed ID: 11654845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
    Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
    Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
    Ballard T
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():139-87. PubMed ID: 11652871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control?
    Arthur SL
    UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation.
    Burke M
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights?
    Persels J
    J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implanted birth control device renews debate over forced contraception.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Welfare and coerced contraception: morality implications of state sponsored reproductive control.
    Blake M
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1995-1996 Spring; 34(2):311-44. PubMed ID: 11654442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
    Cepko R
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
    Sangree S
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The constitutionality of court-imposed birth control as a condition of probation.
    Lipton JP; Campbell CF
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1989; 6(2):271-98. PubMed ID: 11652002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rights and wrongs of Norplant offers.
    Berman DA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1993; 3(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 11652937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Moss K
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control?
    Spitz SS
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judge is firm on forced contraception, but welcomes an appeal.
    Lev M
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whose choice is it, anyway?
    MacKenzie JP
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.