These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659741)

  • 1. Two patients or one? Problems of consent in obstetrics.
    Miller L
    Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 11659741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict?
    Rogers S
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
    Tolton C
    Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
    Hanigsberg JE
    Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apprehending the fetus en ventre sa mere: a study in judicial sleight of hand.
    Tateishi SA
    Sask Law Rev; 1989; 53(1):113-41. PubMed ID: 11656024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy.
    Mayo TW
    Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
    Goldberg S
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
    Levy JK
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
    Grant I
    Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary: no more jurisdiction over Jehovah.
    Goldblatt AD
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 11657466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.