These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659750)

  • 1. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
    Flannery MT
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
    Sangree S
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women and fetus: the social construction of conflict.
    Chavkin W
    Women Crim Justice; 1992; 3(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 11656335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
    Johnsen DE
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime?
    Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V
    Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
    Robertson JA
    Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Moss K
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minnesota's "crack baby" law: weapon of war or link in a chain?
    Johnson JM
    Law Inequal; 1990 Jul; 8(3):485-531. PubMed ID: 11651347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
    Goldberg S
    Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?
    Blickenstaff DC
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal operation opens up legal controversy.
    Anderson I
    New Sci; 1986 Oct; 112(1530):20. PubMed ID: 11655809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women.
    Annas GJ
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.