295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659778)
1. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy.
Brown JP
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
Poole EK
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications.
Wurmbrand MJ
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court gives ex-husband rights on use of embryos.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment.
Van de Weghe B
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal status of the embryo.
Andrews LB
Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
Muller RJ
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Social values in a brave new world: toward a public policy regarding embryo status and in vitro fertilization.
Dickman DG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):817-51. PubMed ID: 11649208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The ectogenetic human being: a problem child of our time.
Dickens BM
Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1979 Winter 1979-80; 18(1):241-67. PubMed ID: 11665167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Davis v. Davis: what about future disputes?
Feliciano T
Conn Law Rev; 1993; 26(1):305-53. PubMed ID: 11660034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol.
Frankel LH; Flynn JJ
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
