These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659778)

  • 21. Conceiving to abort and donate fetal tissue: new ethical strains in the transplantation field -- a survey of existing law and a proposal for change.
    Bregman JS
    UCLA Law Rev; 1989; 36(6):1167-205. PubMed ID: 11659206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Solomon decision: a study of Davis v. Davis.
    Eget MM
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1113-28. PubMed ID: 11651437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
    Lusby K
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
    Capron AM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
    Parness JA
    West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Goldenberg D
    Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproductive technology and international mechanisms of protection of the human person.
    Knoppers BM
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 11658935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case.
    Dworkin R
    Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
    Johnsen DE
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Life's Dominion: a review essay.
    Bradley GV
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1993; 69(2):329-91. PubMed ID: 11656437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guardianship and the IVF human embryo.
    Kasimba P; Buckle S
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1989; 17():139-52. PubMed ID: 11659316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
    Scotland AG
    Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
    Cica N
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.