311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659785)
1. Mama vs. fetus.
Hornick HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Johnsen DE
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
Goldberg S
Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
Phelan JP
South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Krauss DJ
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Bennett B
Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
Hanigsberg JE
Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Gallagher J
Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
Parness JA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus.
Balisy SS
South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights.
Crockett KG; Hyman M
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Johnsen D
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights.
Dobson T; Eby KK
St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?
Blickenstaff DC
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dorczak A
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 11656494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting parents' freedom to have children with genetic differences.
Shepherd L
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1995; 4():761-812. PubMed ID: 11658115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
Martin S; Coleman M
McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
