311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659785)
21. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
Crepps J; Miller A
Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
Gallagher J
Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
Goldberg S
Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
Tolton C
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
Flannery MT
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
Manson R; Marolt J
Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fetal surgery: a developing legal dilemma.
Rauscher K
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):775-95. PubMed ID: 11658987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
Peach LJ
J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Minnesota's "crack baby" law: weapon of war or link in a chain?
Johnson JM
Law Inequal; 1990 Jul; 8(3):485-531. PubMed ID: 11651347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Fetal abuse: an exploration of emerging philosophic, legal, and policy issues.
Losco J
West Polit Q; 1989 Jun; 42(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 11659161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
Grant I
Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict?
Rogers S
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy.
Mayo TW
Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Neglect of the unborn child: an analysis based on law in the United States.
Bross DC; Meredyth A
Child Abuse Negl; 1979; 3(Part 2):643-50. PubMed ID: 11658678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women.
Annas GJ
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
Linton PB
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
Neff CL
Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
Ouellette A
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Beyond survival: the procreative rights of women with HIV.
Boockvar K
Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1994; 14(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 11652889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
