These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659799)
1. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view. Giesen D; Hayes J Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California. Churchward AB Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia. Manderson D Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures. Skegg PD Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent. Grubbs WG Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimentation on humans and gifts of tissue: Articles 20-23 of the Civil Code. Owker WF McGill Law J; 1973; 19(2):161-94. PubMed ID: 11664267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decision-making: patient participation. Wolfgarten A; Khan A Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond Bolam: responding to the patient. Feenan DK Med Law Int; 1994; 1(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 11653113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians. Bobinski MA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Demanded medical care. Menikoff J Ariz State Law J; 1998; 30(4):1091-126. PubMed ID: 11660771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to say yes: the ethics of consent to medical treatment. Scutt JA Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 11653999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]