321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659855)
21. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent?
Geller JL; Lidz CW; Pattulo EL
IRB; 1987; 9(5):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Research privacy or freedom of information?
Nease DE; Doukas DJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(3):47. PubMed ID: 11645167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects.
Fletcher JC
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Normal and normative ethics in behavioral sciences.
Reese HW; Fremouw WJ
Am Psychol; 1984 Aug; 39(8):863-76. PubMed ID: 11644156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of informed consent regulations on response rate and response bias.
Lueptow L; Mueller SA; Hammes RR; Master LS
Sociol Methods Res; 1977 Nov; 6(2):183-204. PubMed ID: 11658498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical and Legal Issues in AIDS Research Joni N. Gray, Phillip M. Lyons, and Gary B. Melton.
Weimer D
J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 11644848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion and the neutral state.
Hunt RP
First Things; 1990 Oct; 6():42-5. PubMed ID: 11659507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reconciling reason and religion: on Dworkin and religious freedom.
Stacy T
George Washington Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 63(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 11660276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Issues presented by mandatory reporting requirements to researchers of child abuse and neglect.
Sieber JE
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The case of two devices: disclosure to subjects following Phase IV ("post-marketing") research.
Anderson JR; Jameton A; Reitemeier PJ; Prentice E
IRB; 1995; 17(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Federal regulation of social research. Is "prior review" posing a threat to academic freedom?
Seiler LH; Murtha JM
Freedom Issue; 1979; (53):. PubMed ID: 11663338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Will the real bioethics (commission) please stand up?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8045761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal tissue transplants.
Robertson JA
Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):443-98. PubMed ID: 11659170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Research participation as a contract.
Lawson C
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The absolute ethical requirement of individual, informed consent: a commentary on Barrett and Parker.
Lie R
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Jul; 22(3):18-22. PubMed ID: 14682317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Human experimentation and human rights.
Katz J
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
Kass LR
New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Deception methods in psychology: have they changed in 23 years?
Sieber JE; Iannuzzo R; Rodriguez B
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 11654171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. AIDS and the FDA: an ethical case for limiting patient access to new medical therapies.
Shorr AF
IRB; 1992; 14(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Judging the past. The case of the human radiation experiments.
Buchanan A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):25-30. PubMed ID: 8736672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
