These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
904 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659879)
1. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe. Kiernan V New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health Sciences Council of Japan adopts guidelines for gene therapy clinical research. Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):560-3. PubMed ID: 11657358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective. Bagley G Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH. Reynolds PD Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995. Levine RJ Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. IRBs and research with human biological materials. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court tells jury to ignore human subject protection regulations. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Mar; 10(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary. Reiser SJ; Knudson P IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protection of persons undergoing biomedical research: Code of Public Health; Book IIA. France Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Mar; No. 66():8-11. PubMed ID: 11651087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]