BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659894)

  • 1. University probe faults 'cloning' research.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1994 Dec; 146(25):406. PubMed ID: 11659894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embryo cloners jumped the gun.
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5193):1949. PubMed ID: 11644654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. halts research on humans at Duke: university can't ensure safety, probers find.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Government guinea pigs.
    Rothman DJ
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In tests on people, who watches the watchers?
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments.
    Hilts PJ; Stolberg SG
    N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical ethics in the dock.
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects.
    Wheeler DL
    Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital failed on human research policy.
    Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Britain and Australia, new in vitro guidelines.
    Levine C
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 11643983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duke's plan ends the ban on research.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand.
    Levine C
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lively debate on research ethics in the US: meeting report.
    Nicholson RH
    Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Nov; No. 143():3-7. PubMed ID: 11657620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Let no one split asunder: controversy in human genetic engineering.
    Robin SS; Markle GE; Curd M; Duster T; Lappé M; Mazur A
    Politics Life Sci; 1987 Aug; 6(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 11650017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IVF--in vitro fertilization.
    Kieffer GH
    Am Biol Teach; 1980 Apr; 42(4):211-218, 231. PubMed ID: 11658496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. V.A. hospital is told to halt all research.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11648101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cloning without prior approval: a response to recent disclosures of noncompliance.
    Macklin R
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Mar; 5(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10141719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Governmental regulation of the investigation of human subjects in social research.
    Pattullo EL
    Minerva; 1985; 23(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 11645795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.