176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659894)
21. Test tube babies: proposals for legal regulation of new methods of human conception and prenatal development.
Oakley MA
Fam Law Q; 1974; 8(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 11661115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Agency faults a U.C.L.A. study for suffering of mental patients.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders.
Hoppe SK
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. All is not well in research on human subjects.
Goldman J
N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of IRBs on political science research.
Cleary RE
IRB; 1987; 9(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 11652494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974.
U.S
US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Normal and normative ethics in behavioral sciences.
Reese HW; Fremouw WJ
Am Psychol; 1984 Aug; 39(8):863-76. PubMed ID: 11644156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Federal regulation of social research. Is "prior review" posing a threat to academic freedom?
Seiler LH; Murtha JM
Freedom Issue; 1979; (53):. PubMed ID: 11663338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making.
Cohen JM; Hedberg WB
J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. NIH severs ties with researcher who experimented on embryos.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Jan; ():A6-7. PubMed ID: 11648051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. New initiative to accredit all institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11658058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. University panel faults cloning co-author.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 16514740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
