154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659917)
1. State political cultures and public opinion about abortion.
Cook EA; Jelen TG; Wilcox C
Polit Res Q; 1993 Dec; 46(4):771-81. PubMed ID: 11659917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The new power of labels in the abortion wars.
Whitman D
US News World Rep; 1990 Jul; 109(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 11645681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion's hardest cases.
Carlson M
Time; 1990 Jul; 136(2):22-7. PubMed ID: 11645680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Male attitudes toward abortion: an analysis of urban survey data.
Adebayo A
Soc Indic Res; 1990 Mar; 22(2):213-28. PubMed ID: 11659252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: ambiguous criteria and confusing policies.
Figueira-McDonough J
Affilia; 1990; 5(4):27-54. PubMed ID: 11659769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion: a new round.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. British public supports legal abortion for all.
Wise J
BMJ; 1997 Mar; 314(7081):627. PubMed ID: 11644910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Presbyterians and abortion.
Christ Century; 1991 Feb; 108(6):192. PubMed ID: 11659414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who's pro-choice and why.
Betzig L; Lombardo LH
Ethol Sociobiol; 1992 Jan; 13(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 11656142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable predictors of attitudes toward the legalization of abortion.
Szafran RF; Clagett AF
Soc Indic Res; 1988 Jun; 20(3):271-90. PubMed ID: 11655894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Parental consent to abortion: how enforcement can vary.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Do parental involvement laws reduce adolescent abortion rates?
Ohsfeldt RL; Gohmann SF
Contemp Econ Policy; 1994 Apr; 12(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 11659976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion -- impact on public health.
Malkasian GD
State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Political and socioeconomic indicators of state restrictiveness toward abortion.
Strickland RA; Whicker ML
Policy Stud J; 1992; 20(4):598-617. PubMed ID: 11660186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. Supreme Court clears way for Florida teen to have abortion.
Schmatz J
N Y Times Web; 1989 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion: the controversy we can't seem to solve.
Dobell ER
Redbook; 1979 Jun; 153(2):42+. PubMed ID: 11655701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public still backs abortion, but wants limits, poll says.
Goldberg C; Elder J
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
