244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659939)
1. Reproductive technology and disability: searching for the "rights" and "wrongs" in explanation.
Mosoff J
Dalhous Law J; 1993; 16():98-124. PubMed ID: 11659939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Female self-determination between feminist claims and 'voluntary' eugenics, between 'rights' and ethics.
Degener T
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11650920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Against selection of human life -- people with disabilities oppose genetic counselling.
Waldschmidt A
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11653997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
Shakespeare T
Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The deflective power of reproductive technologies: the impact on women.
Woliver LR
Women Polit; 1989; 9(3):17-47. PubMed ID: 11659737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The eugenic and racist premise of reproductive rights and population control.
Akhter F
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
Robertson JA
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Culture, reproductive technology and women's rights: an intergovernmental perspective.
Brody EB
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Dec; 9(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 11659631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlling HIV-positive women's procreative destiny: a critical equal protection analysis.
Weiss JS
Const Law J; 1992; 2(2):643-718. PubMed ID: 11651626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Perfect mothers, perfect babies: an examination of the ethics of fetal treatments.
Kaufmann CL
Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11650373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Society's response to the new reproductive technologies: the feminist perspectives.
Wikler NJ
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1043-57. PubMed ID: 11655849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New reproductive technologies in India: a print media analysis.
Lingam L
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 11649278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mother matters: a fresh look at prenatal genetic testing.
Lippman A
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11653996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services.
Waxman BF
Sex Disabil; 1994; 12(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 11656410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On the use of IVF by post-menopausal women.
Parks JA
Hypatia; 1999; 14(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 11660700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The reproduction of America.
Rudy K
J Med Humanit; 1994; 15(4):201-15. PubMed ID: 11645894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New reproductive technologies: international feminist concerns.
Kanno N
Sci People; 1987; 19(4):5-8,27. PubMed ID: 11655838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 'Kinder oder Keine-Entscheiden wir alleine': on the abolition of the law against abortion and the patriarchal need to protect embryos.
Sadrozinski R
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 11650409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. International protection of women's reproductive rights.
Cook RJ
N Y Univ J Int Law Polit; 1992; 24(2):645-727. PubMed ID: 11656212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion: the seduction of medicine.
Rodgers BD; Rodgers DE
Lib Life Fam; 1996; 2(2):285-308. PubMed ID: 11660385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
