These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659955)
1. A suitable case for treatment: should a tribunal discharge a patient if no effective treatment is available? Gibbons J New Law J; 1994 Apr; 144(6645):567-568, 573. PubMed ID: 11659955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. R v. Canons Park Mental Health Review Tribunal, ex parte A. Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Jul; [1994] 1():481-94. PubMed ID: 11648636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Mental Health Act 1983. Hoggett B Public Law; 1983; ():172-90. PubMed ID: 11658503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mental Health (Amendment) Act 1982. Gunn MJ Mod Law Rev; 1983 May; 46(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 11658501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain. Levy A; Davidson S Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rights within the therapeutic relationship. King P J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals. Anderson K Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legalism revived: new mental health legislation in England. Shapland J; Williams T Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):351-69. PubMed ID: 11658607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--mental health--a patient involuntarily civilly committed to a state mental hospital has a constitutional right to treatment. North BS Villanova Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 20(1):214-25. PubMed ID: 11664581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment. Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill. Lundeen PA Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill. Fields JD Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty. Cooper GG Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]