BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659969)

  • 1. An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    J Matern Fetal Investig; 1991; 1():175-80. PubMed ID: 11659969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    West J Med; 1993 Sep; 159(3):369-99. PubMed ID: 11643180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric ethics and the abortion controversy.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11652828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prematernal duty and the resolution of conflict.
    Yeast JD
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11653277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reflection on the physician's responsibility to mother and fetus.
    Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Biomedical Ethics Committee
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1993 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 11659577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
    Knopoff KA
    Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients, agents, and informed consent.
    Haber JG
    J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fetus as a patient.
    Kurjak A; Kos M
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1994; 48(3):95-8. PubMed ID: 11654345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 11642910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A womb of my own: a moral evaluation of Ohio's treatment of pregnant patients with living wills.
    Lederman AD
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1994; 45(1):351-77. PubMed ID: 11656507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
    Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical decision-making in obstetrics and gynecology.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    ACOG Tech Bull; 1989 Nov; No. 136():1-7. PubMed ID: 11659205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.
    Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perfect mothers, perfect babies: an examination of the ethics of fetal treatments.
    Kaufmann CL
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11650373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
    Finer JJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal surgery: a developing legal dilemma.
    Rauscher K
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):775-95. PubMed ID: 11658987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
    Pellegrino ED
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.