257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659973)
1. Making rights real: Roe's impact on abortion access.
Fung A
Polit Soc; 1993 Dec; 21(4):465-504. PubMed ID: 11659973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic.
George J
Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and a nation at war.
First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion laws: comparative and feminist perspectives in Australia, England and the United States.
Petersen K
Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):77-105. PubMed ID: 11657551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
Jones CJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
Simmons PD
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Henry KS
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Crying stones": a comparison of abortion in Japan and the United States.
Wardle LD
N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 1993; 14(2-3):183-259. PubMed ID: 11659814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Workability of the undue burden test.
Schneider EA
Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
Berlin SI
Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
Schmidt CG
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Will Roe v. Wade survive the Rehnquist Court?
Johnsen D; Wilder M
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):457-69. PubMed ID: 11650350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
Bezanson RP
Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
