These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659976)

  • 1. Do parental involvement laws reduce adolescent abortion rates?
    Ohsfeldt RL; Gohmann SF
    Contemp Econ Policy; 1994 Apr; 12(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 11659976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion law fight turns to rights of teen-agers.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 23. PubMed ID: 11647866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological and legal issues in minors' rights to abortion.
    Pliner AJ; Yates S
    J Soc Issues; 1992; 48(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 11656503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion's hardest cases.
    Carlson M
    Time; 1990 Jul; 136(2):22-7. PubMed ID: 11645680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion: a new round.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors' demand for abortions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Hum Resour; 1996; 31(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 11660452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parental consent to abortion: how enforcement can vary.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
    Schmidt CG
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Requiring parents' consent on abortion is upheld.
    N Y Times Web; 1993 May; ():28. PubMed ID: 11647939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion -- impact on public health.
    Malkasian GD
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Schools and abortion: a new debate.
    Terry D
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kids, sex, and contraceptives: dilemmas in a liberal society.
    Merrick JC
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):281-2. PubMed ID: 11654799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion rights of minors weighed.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():B32. PubMed ID: 11647378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidentiality and young people.
    Gillick V
    Ethics Med; 1988; 4(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 11659097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Canadian perspective on adolescent sexuality and public policy: requiring parental involvement is bad law and bad medicine.
    Bala M; Bala N
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):285-7. PubMed ID: 11654801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.