These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660027)

  • 1. Self-directed death, euthanasia, and the termination of life-support: reasonable decisions to die.
    Neeley GS
    Campbell Law Rev; 1994; 16(2):205-29. PubMed ID: 11660027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All's well that ends well: toward a policy of assisted rational suicide or merely enlightened self determination?
    Smith GP
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):275-419. PubMed ID: 11650248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
    Molenda FA
    Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a constitutional right to die?
    Wickett A
    Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
    Zaremba JF
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
    Matthews MA
    Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
    Allsopp ME
    Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
    Watson DE
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Living wills and the right to die with dignity.
    Lanham D; Fehlberg B
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 18(2):329-49. PubMed ID: 11651582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. People with pipes: a question of euthanasia.
    Machler S
    Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16(2):781-832. PubMed ID: 11659755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right to death.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To die with dignity: comparing physician assisted suicide in the United States, Japan, and the Netherlands.
    Hall AC
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1996; 74(3):803-40. PubMed ID: 11660537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
    Solnick PB
    Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
    Carnerie F
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
    Dresser R
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
    Clementino BJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
    Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medico-legal aspects of the 'right to die' legislation in Australia.
    Mendelson D
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 19(1):112-52. PubMed ID: 11654112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination.
    DiCamillo JA
    Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.