250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660080)
1. Objectivity in research; final rule.
U.S. Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1995 Jul; 60(132):35810-9. PubMed ID: 11660080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform.
Maatz CT
High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.
Friedman PJ
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 11651613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal agency revises rule on financial disclosure by researchers.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Feb; 14(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Competing interests: the need to control conflict of interests in biomedical research.
Steiner D
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):457-68. PubMed ID: 11657732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
Green HP
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A question of "fitness.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4963):198. PubMed ID: 11642777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflicts of interest.
Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6236):664. PubMed ID: 11644385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Public-private partnerships in biomedical research: resolving conflicts arising under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986.
Bulleit TN
J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11652568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New rules will force doctors to disclose ties to drug industry.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HHS publishes final debarment regulations.
Levine C
IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):10. PubMed ID: 11661885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects; notice and proposed rules.
U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
Fed Regist; 1988 Nov; 53(218):45660-82. PubMed ID: 11645617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Risky alliance on medicine's cutting edge: firm faces business, ethics issues in NIH joint venture.
Lehrman S
Washington Post; 1991 Aug; ():Business 1, 14. PubMed ID: 11646923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Citing abortion, U.S. extends ban on grants for fetal tissue work.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, B19. PubMed ID: 11647868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should AIDS research be regulated? A Manhattan Project for AIDS and other policy proposals.
Salbu SR
Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(2):425-75. PubMed ID: 11652751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. FDA issues concerning conflicts of interest.
Kurt TL
IRB; 1990; 12(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
