These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660123)
1. Fatherhood from the grave: an analysis of postmortem insemination. Gilbert S Hofstra Law Rev; 1993; 22(2):521-65. PubMed ID: 11660123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial procreation, societal reconceptions: legal insight from France. Jones DJ Am J Comp Law; 1988; 36(3):525-45. PubMed ID: 11659138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sperm as property. Steinbock B Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):57-71. PubMed ID: 11655140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hecht v. Superior Court: recognizing a property right in reproductive material. Collins JL Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Summer; 33(3):661-84. PubMed ID: 11660116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Posthumous reproduction. Robertson JA Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology. Smith GP; Iraola R Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fatherhood after death: a legal and ethical analysis of posthumous reproduction. Corvalan A Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1997; 7():E1-E26. PubMed ID: 16518900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate. Langley DB Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Williams HE Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What does it mean to be a "parent"? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights. Hill JL N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 May; 66(2):353-420. PubMed ID: 11659546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction. Robertson JA South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconceiving privacy: relationships and reproductive technology. Rao R UCLA Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 45(4):1077-123. PubMed ID: 11660817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial reproduction and child custody. Dickens BM Can Bar Rev; 1987 Mar; 66(1):49-75. PubMed ID: 11658911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Litigation, legislation, and limelight: obstacles to commercial surrogate mother arrangements. Tiller SL Iowa Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 72(2):415-44. PubMed ID: 11658963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproductive technology and the procreation rights of the unmarried. Harv Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 98(3):669-85. PubMed ID: 11649801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]