282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660196)
1. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
Jaegers EM
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
Cepko R
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Dugan JC
Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded.
Denkin JF
Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Debra B.: the best interest standard in court-authorized sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Donahue SM
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):209-32. PubMed ID: 11652532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
Ross DH
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Justice and care: mental disability and sterilization decisions.
Peppin P
Can Hum Rights Yearb; 1989-1990; 6():65-112. PubMed ID: 11659492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Motes v. Hall County.
Georgia. Supreme Court
Rep Cases Decided Supreme Court State Ga Ga Supreme Court; 1983 Sep; 251():373-5. PubMed ID: 12041501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons.
Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP
Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three generations, no imbeciles: new light on Buck v. Bell.
Lombardo PA
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1985 Apr; 60(1):30-62. PubMed ID: 11658945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
Burnett BA
Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
Irvine AC
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
Murdock CW
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward creating a philosophy of fundamental human rights.
Lackland TH
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):473-503. PubMed ID: 11663601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
