148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660197)
1. The review of the compulsory detention of the mentally ill: who should decide?
Mulvany J
Aust J Soc Issues; 1993 Aug; 28(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 11660197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychiatric commitment in Japan: international concern and domestic reform.
Cohen PS
UCLA Pac Basin Law J; 1995; 14(1):28-74. PubMed ID: 11660497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bedlam on the streets.
Winerip M
N Y Times Mag; 1999 May; ():42-49, 56, 65-6. PubMed ID: 11648107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill.
Hernandez R
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
Arrigo BA
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary treatment for the homeless mentally ill.
Lamb HR
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1989; 4(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 11659204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The third way in mental health policy: negative rights, positive rights, and the Convention.
Fennell P
J Law Soc; 1999 Mar; 26(1):103-27. PubMed ID: 11660777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court allows holding of mental patients who may cause trouble.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1994 Dec; ():59. PubMed ID: 11646322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
Neff RC
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical issues in the representation of individuals in the commitment process.
Perlin ML; Sadoff RL
Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):161-92. PubMed ID: 11645494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The rights of mental health detainees.
Robinson DA; Motz BM
Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 11653529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
Offir CW
Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment.
Allan A; Allan M
S Afr Law J; 1997; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of the dangerousness standard in civil commitment.
Hiday VA; Smith LN
J Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 11659010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics, money, and the problem of coercion in managed behavioral health care.
Petrila J
St Louis Univ Law J; 1996; 40(2):359-405. PubMed ID: 11660534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
