396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660228)
1. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The institutional context for research.
Berger EM; Gert B
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):17-46. PubMed ID: 11655037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
Anderson J
J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
Green HP
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.
Sprague RL
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On being a whistleblower: the Needleman case.
Ernhart CB; Scarr S; Geneson DF
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11653083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.
Francis S
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
Scarr S; Ernhart CB
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?
Lubalin JS; Matheson JL
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):229-50. PubMed ID: 11657861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
