396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660228)
41. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. NIH committee sheds darkness on UCSD case.
Wade N
Science; 1981 Apr; 212(4490):27. PubMed ID: 11643634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?
Steneck NH
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 11657853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Embryo cloners jumped the gun.
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5193):1949. PubMed ID: 11644654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
Fackelmann KA
Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
Efron R
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
Poon P
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand.
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis).
Ryan KJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
Chubin DE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Researchers and the privacy act: Fisher v. National Institutes of Health (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Agency clears genetic researcher.
Schneider K
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
