These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660320)
1. What's good for the goose is good for the gander: toward recognition of men's reproductive rights. Totz MA North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1994; 15(1):141-236. PubMed ID: 11660320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision. Sanders JE Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Of ice and men: the big chill over women's reproductive rights. Raymond JG Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11649281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The husband's rights in abortion. Etzioni A Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consent provisions in abortion statutes. Levitz KB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(4):645-62. PubMed ID: 11664386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father? Georgius EH Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Poe v. Gerstein. 18 Aug 1975. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1975; 517():787-97. PubMed ID: 11646046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade. Tapovatz WE St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion--father held to have no right to restrain mother of unborn child from obtaining abortion. Howell N Cumberland Samford Law Rev; 1974; 4(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 11661221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal and postnatal rights of incarcerated mothers. Norz F Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1989; 20(2):S:55-73. PubMed ID: 11659489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A man's right to be equal: the abortion issue. Shalev C Isr Law Rev; 1983; 18(3-4):381-430. PubMed ID: 11659119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioethics and fatherhood. Callahan D Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 11656532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sperm-napping and the right not to have a child. Paske GH Australas J Philos; 1987 Mar; 65(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 11658985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]