These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660321)

  • 1. The psychotherapist-patient privilege: a therapeutic jurisprudence view.
    Winick BJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 50(2):249-65. PubMed ID: 11660321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should there be a psychotherapist privilege in military courts-martial?
    Hayden DL
    Mil Law Rev; 1989; 123():31-107. PubMed ID: 11660232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward uniform application of a federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Baytion CM
    Wash Law Rev; 1995 Jan; 70(1):153-75. PubMed ID: 11660174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The privilege study: an empirical examination of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Shuman DW; Weiner MS
    North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):893-942. PubMed ID: 11658717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence law--the psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts.
    Cerveny K; Kent MJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 59(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 11658789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eavesdropping on the 50-minute hour: managed mental health care and confidentiality.
    Corcoran K; Winslade WJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12():351-65. PubMed ID: 11660198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Privacy in personal medical information: a diagnosis.
    Newman S
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1981; 33(3):394-424. PubMed ID: 11649692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Hyde decision denies equal health care access'.
    Branch De
    Ob Gyn News; 1980 Aug; 15(15):1+. PubMed ID: 11664010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.
    Eisenberg RS
    Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Justices uphold psychotherapy privacy rights.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A1, A25. PubMed ID: 11648020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk and rationality: the Centers for Disease Control and the regulation of HIV-infected health care workers.
    Bobinski MA
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(2):213-307. PubMed ID: 11659786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis.
    Nicholson JB; Steward DW
    Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social, legal, medical and ethical challenges of HIV infection (Part I).
    Hirsh HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39():324-56. PubMed ID: 11659668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rationales for the confidentiality of psychotherapist-patient communications: testimonial privilege and the Constitution.
    Courville CP
    Houst Law Rev; 1998; 35(1):187-226. PubMed ID: 14628847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court's decision to recognize a psychotherapist privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996): the meaning of "experience and the role of "reason" under Federal Rule of Evidence 501.
    Amann DM; Imwinkelried EJ
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1997; 65(4):1019-49. PubMed ID: 16086528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Government funding, abortions, and the public forum.
    Canby WC
    Ariz State Law J; 1979; 1979(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 11664054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: the Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote.
    Harris GC
    Wash Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 74(1):33-68. PubMed ID: 11865923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underprivileged communications: extension of the psychotherapist-patient privilege to patients of psychiatric social workers.
    Delgado R
    Calif Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 61(4):1050-71. PubMed ID: 11661040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Policy-makers chip away at confidentiality protections.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Aug; 14(15 Bonus Report):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.