168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660328)
1. Informed refusal. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 166.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Professional Liability
ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Dec; No. 166():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informing patients about medical risks.
Texas Medical Disclosure Panel
Tex Med; 1982 Mar; 78(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 11643732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical considerations in sterilization. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 73.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Ethics
ACOG Comm Opin; 1989 Sep; No. 73():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed decision making: CMA policy summary.
Canadian Medical Association
CMAJ; 1986 Nov; 135(10):1208A-B. PubMed ID: 11658851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent standardized to lessen suit risk.
Med World News; 1982 May; 23(11):23-4. PubMed ID: 11645470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: ethical considerations for physicians and surgeons.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1988 Jan; 21(1):24a-b. PubMed ID: 11649951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking.
Simpson RE
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 76(1):172-207. PubMed ID: 11658361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sterilization of women who are mentally handicapped. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 63.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Ethics
ACOG Comm Opin; 1988 Sep; No. 63():3 p. PubMed ID: 11660331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for breast cancer patients.
American Medical Association. Department of State Legislation
J Iowa Med Soc; 1985 Feb; 75(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 11658601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule.
Karlson HC; Erwin RD
Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal issues in determining competence to make treatment decisions.
Benesch K
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1989; No. 41():97-105. PubMed ID: 11659187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Human immunodeficiency virus infection: physicians' responsibilities. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 130.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Ethics
ACOG Comm Opin; 1993 Nov; No. 130():4 p. PubMed ID: 11660327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent to medical treatment: the use of consent forms.
Hearn WR
Health Law Can; 1992; 12(3):67-72, 89. PubMed ID: 10116976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine?
Friedman DA
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient consent in Louisiana.
Dewey EP
Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
