475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660406)
1. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent.
Santurri EN; Werpehowski W
Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
Cerminara KL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogate consent.
Richards N
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients.
Francis LP
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Life, death, and incompetent patients: conceptual infirmities and hidden values in the law.
Dresser R
Ariz Law Rev; 1986; 28(3):373-405. PubMed ID: 11652552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society?
Rothenberg KH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
