417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660409)
1. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
Keville TD
Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
Gorenberg H; White A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. There is no women's health crisis.
Satel SL
Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The sex-bias myth in medicine.
Kadar AG
Atl Mon; 1994 Aug; 274(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11659876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's Health Law Symposium, Rutgers School of Law-Newark, April 6, 1994.
Keville T; Johnson TL; Epstein SS; Podhorin R; Swanston SF
Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 16(1):17-41. PubMed ID: 11654984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Women and HIV/AIDS research: the barriers to equity.
Levine C
IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11659324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science by quota: P.C. medicine.
Satel SL
New Repub; 1995 Feb; 212(9):14, 16. PubMed ID: 11655245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HIV, women, and access to clinical trials: tort liability and lessons from DES.
Mastroianni AC
Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):167-91. PubMed ID: 11979601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials.
Charo RA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Exclusion of pregnant women from research protocols: unethical and illegal.
Hall JK
IRB; 1995; 17(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11653053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gender matters: implications for clinical research and women's health care.
Rothenberg KH
Houst Law Rev; 1996 Symposium; 32(5):1201-72. PubMed ID: 11660524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's health research: policy and practice.
Ickovics JR; Epel ES
IRB; 1993; 15(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
Williams WW
Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Women not shortchanged in trials?
Holden C
Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5306):1571-3. PubMed ID: 11644903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal protection programs under Title VII--rebutting the procreation assumption.
Blanco AC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1985; 46(3):755-94. PubMed ID: 11649206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. government-sponsored radiation research on humans 1945-1975.
McCally M; Cassel C; Kimball DG
Med Glob Surviv; 1994 Mar; 1(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 11652281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects.
Fletcher JC
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
