These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660444)

  • 1. Class debates: reproductive, disability rights mix in KKK Act cases.
    Gibeaut J
    ABA J; 1997 Aug; 83():36-7. PubMed ID: 11660444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
    Estacio RA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
    Dugan JC
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When terminating parental rights is not enough: a new look at compulsory sterilization.
    Blum ET
    Georgia Law Rev; 1994; 28(4):977-1017. PubMed ID: 11653343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
    Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
    Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
    Coleman SS
    S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
    Cepko R
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
    Jaegers EM
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
    Murdock CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
    Ross DH
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice.
    Law S
    Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons.
    Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP
    Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procreation and the population problem.
    Shaw MW
    North Carol Law Rev; 1977 Sep; 55(6):1165-85. PubMed ID: 11664837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developments--the family. V. Procreative rights.
    Harv Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 93(6):1296-308. PubMed ID: 11665179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sterilization rights of mental retardates.
    Munro AB
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1982; 39(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights.
    Linn B
    Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equitable jurisdiction to order sterilizations.
    McIvor CL
    Wash Law Rev; 1982 Mar; 57(2):373-87. PubMed ID: 11658629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to parenthood.
    Wright PA
    Fam Law Rev; 1979; 2(3):173-85. PubMed ID: 11665242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell.
    Berry RM
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel.
    Henry NB
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.