These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660481)

  • 1. Irreconcilable differences: a parent's right to refuse to consent to the medical treatment of a child.
    Neild P
    Fam Concil Courts Rev; 1995 Jul; 33(3):342-60. PubMed ID: 11660481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The outer limits of parental autonomy: withholding medical treatment from children.
    Vorys YV
    Ohio State Law J; 1981; 43(3):813-29. PubMed ID: 11658709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
    Smith SR
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
    Goldberg S
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities.
    HarveyParedes T
    SMU Law Rev; 1992; 46(3):805-40. PubMed ID: 11659757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
    Zaremba JF
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Mulholland KA
    Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
    Riga PJ
    Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment.
    Davis PK
    Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases.
    Brant J
    Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Therefore choose death?
    Appelbaum PS; Klein JI
    Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The right over one's own body: its scope and limits in comparative law.
    Meulders-Klein MT
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(1):29-79. PubMed ID: 11655891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human rights and human life: an uneven fit.
    Patterson EG
    Tulane Law Rev; 1994 Jun; 68(6):1527-61. PubMed ID: 11656638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
    Carnerie F
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Engineering perfect offspring: devaluing children and childhood.
    Fitzgerald WA
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):833-61. PubMed ID: 11657285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis.
    Wood AT
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
    Keyserlingk EW
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.