419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660513)
1. The price of profit.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2134):20-1. PubMed ID: 11660513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Squabbling all the way to the genebank.
Kleiner K
New Sci; 1994 Nov; 144(1953):14-5. PubMed ID: 11656411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patenting gene fragments.
Agrawal A
Econ Polit Wkly; 1993 May; 28(22):1089-93. PubMed ID: 11660270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should genes be patented? The gene patenting controversy: legal, ethical, and policy foundations of an international agreement.
Looney B
Law Policy Int Bus; 1994; 26(1):231-72. PubMed ID: 11979605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Human Genome Project and patents.
Science; 1991 Dec; 254(5039):1710, 1712. PubMed ID: 1763316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Human Genome Project in the United States: a perspective on the commercial, ethical, legislative and health care issues.
Mackler BF; Barach M
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 11654898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Human Genome Project: bibliography of ethical, social, legal, and scientific aspects.
Arizona State University Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):223-311. PubMed ID: 11659418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should we patent God's creation?
Peters T
Dialog; 1996; 35(2):117-32. PubMed ID: 11660577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patents and the Human Genome Project.
Smith GK; Kettelberger DM
AIPLA Q J; 1994; 22(1):27-64. PubMed ID: 11660522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. seeks patent on genetic codes, setting off furor.
Andrews EL
N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive?
Withers WW; Kenworthy PG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gene dream fades away.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2005):14-5. PubMed ID: 11656474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patents, morality and DNA: should there be intellectual property protection of the Human Genome Project?
Gannon P; Guthrie T; Laurie G
Med Law Int; 1995; 1(4):321-45. PubMed ID: 11660020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. University-industry relationships in genetic research: potential opportunities and pitfalls.
Walsh ME; Graber GC; Wolfe AK
Account Res; 1997; 5(4):265-82. PubMed ID: 11656993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the Human Genome Project at the interface between patent and FDA laws.
Cunningham BC
Risk; 1996; 7(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 11655078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patenting of human genes, cells and parts of the body? -- the ethical dimensions of patent law.
Moufang R
IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1994; 25(4):487-515. PubMed ID: 11660161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.
Eisenberg RS
Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science.
Rai AK
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):77-152. PubMed ID: 12784815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human genome research and the responsible use of new genetic knowledge.
Juengst ET; Watson JD
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. All rights reserved: how the gene-patenting race is affecting science.
Wuethrich B
Sci News; 1993 Sep; 144(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 11659682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
