553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660527)
1. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws.
Peters PG
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical futility: a futile concept?
Shiner K
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When medical treatment is futile.
Prager K
Wall St J (East Ed); 1995 Jun; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
Crossley MA
Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Negotiating towards death.
Winkelstein P
Shma; 1996 Feb; 26(508):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
Clark FI
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical futility and implications for physician autonomy.
Daar JF
Am J Law Med; 1995; 21(2-3):221-40. PubMed ID: 8571976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care rationing and disability rights.
Peters PG
Indiana Law J; 1995; 70(2):491-547. PubMed ID: 11660218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Our discardable people.
Smith WJ
Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(3):78-87. PubMed ID: 11657682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Withholding care from patients: Boston case asks who decides.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
