These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660528)

  • 1. Sexism and "the superfluous female": arguments for regulating pre-implantation sex selection.
    Danis J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1995; 18():219-64. PubMed ID: 11660528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex selection and reproductive freedom.
    Renteln AD
    Womens Stud Int Forum; 1992; 15(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 11659708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses.
    Young AH
    Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex selection and the Charter.
    Boetzkes E
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1994 Jan; 7(1):173-92. PubMed ID: 11660288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technology and motherhood: reproductive choice reconsidered.
    Rowland R
    Signs (Chic); 1987; 12(3):512-28. PubMed ID: 11658924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing the sexual orientation of children.
    Stein E
    Bioethics; 1998 Jan; 12(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11655306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weaving "birth" technology into the "value and policy web" of medicine, ethics and law: should policies on "conception" be consistent?
    Somerville MA
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):515-608. PubMed ID: 11650354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to procreate: when rights claims have gone wrong.
    Shanner L
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):823-74. PubMed ID: 11654471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Society's response to the new reproductive technologies: the feminist perspectives.
    Wikler NJ
    South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1043-57. PubMed ID: 11655849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
    Robertson JA
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To bear or not to bear: reproductive freedom as an international human right.
    Hernández BE
    Brooklyn J Int Law; 1991; 17(2):309-58. PubMed ID: 11656131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted noncoital reproduction: a comparative analysis.
    Smith GP
    Boston Univ Int Law J; 1990; 8(1):21-52. PubMed ID: 11659376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The hidden cost of sex selection.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1993 May; 138(1871):12-3. PubMed ID: 11659624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
    Menon N
    Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reservations about women: population policy and reproductive rights.
    Abrams P
    Cornell Int Law J; 1996; 29(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 11660507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RU 486 in the United States and Great Britain: a case study in gender bias.
    Chicoine D
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 16(1):81-113. PubMed ID: 11656262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection, by Mary Anne Warren.
    Holmes HB
    Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 11649758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex selective eugenic abortion: prospects in China and India.
    Moen E
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):231-49. PubMed ID: 11651218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A reply to Holmes on Gendercide.
    Warren MA
    Bioethics; 1987 Apr; 1(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 11649835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benign sex discrimination revisited: constitutional and moral issues in banning sex-selection abortion.
    Schedler G
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1988; 15(3):295-343. PubMed ID: 11659237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.