291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660539)
1. Vulnerability: reflection on its ethical implications for the protection of participants in SAMHSA programs.
McGovern TF
Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 11660539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SAMHSA philosophy and statement on ethical principles.
de Jong J; Reatig N
Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 11660542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introduction.
Sewell D
Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 11660538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders.
Hoppe SK
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Participant protection with the use of records: ethical issues and recommendations.
Leigh WA
Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 11660540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
Ackerman TF
IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populations.
Fisher CB
IRB; 1997; 19(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 11655184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Childress JF
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995.
Levine RJ
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRBs: protecting the well-being of subject-participants with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Baylis F
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):183-99. PubMed ID: 11658175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
Brakel SJ
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating science and ethics in research with high-risk children and youth.
Fisher CB
Soc Policy Rep; 1993; 7(4):1-27. PubMed ID: 11659850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulatory orphans: juvenile prisoners as transvulnerable research subjects.
Reed JG
IRB; 1999; 21(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 11657875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ethics of research in mental illness.
Ghaemi SN; Hundert EM
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency, autonomy, and communal values in health care.
Powers M
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1992; 10(2):316-61. PubMed ID: 11659466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Building a new consensus: ethical principles and policies for clinical research on HIV/AIDS.
Levine C; Dubler NN; Levine RJ
IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Unethical questionnaires.
Klockars CB
Society; 1980; 18(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 11661973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An egg takes flight: the once and future life of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Capron AM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Mar; 7(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 11654623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent?
Geller JL; Lidz CW; Pattulo EL
IRB; 1987; 9(5):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Human experimentation and human rights.
Katz J
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
