These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660613)

  • 21. When abortions save lives.
    Thompson D
    Time; 1992 Apr; ():52-3. PubMed ID: 11659436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The fetus as guinea pig.
    Scarf M
    N Y Times Mag; 1975 p 13+; 19 Oct 1975():. PubMed ID: 11664465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A "no" to research on aborted, live fetuses.
    Malloy MT
    Natl Obs; 1973 Apr; ():4. PubMed ID: 11649103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human cloning and the law.
    Newman SA
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 11657282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scientists and fetus research.
    Cohn V
    Washington Post; 1973 Apr; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11649102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fetal position: revised research guidelines.
    Time; 1973 Jul; 102(5):71-2. PubMed ID: 11664193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Citing abortion, U.S. extends ban on grants for fetal tissue work.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, B19. PubMed ID: 11647868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human cloning and the rights of human beings.
    Ayd FJ
    Med Moral Newsl; 1998; 35(5-6):17-23. PubMed ID: 11660579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Administrative developments: NIH backs federal funding for stem cell research.
    Biven M
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 11657149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
    Goldstein C
    Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):229-59. PubMed ID: 15212067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stem cell politics, ethics and medical progress.
    Annas GJ; Caplan A; Elias S
    Nat Med; 1999 Dec; 5(12):1339-41. PubMed ID: 10581063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ethicists urge funding for extraction of embryo cells.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):292. PubMed ID: 10360560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cloning consensus: creating a convention to ban human reproductive cloning.
    Riordan PJ
    Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 2003; 26(2):411-44. PubMed ID: 15744900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Much ado about mutton?
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1850. PubMed ID: 11654834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation.
    Horan DJ
    Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. After Dolly, a slippery ban on human cloning.
    Wright S
    Christ Sci Monitor; 1997 Jun; ():19. PubMed ID: 11647231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Donation and Utilization of Human Fetus and Embryos or of Their Cells, Tissues and Organs: Act 42/1988.
    Spain
    Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Dec; No. 314():. PubMed ID: 12041505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
    Kim S
    Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Federal regulation of fetal research: toward a public policy founded onethical reasoning.
    Markey K
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977; 31(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 11664834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Groups set up panel on use of fetal tissue.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.