581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660621)
1. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
Winick BJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.
Macklin A
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
Dresser RS
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
Ellis JW
Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices.
Fowler M
Columbia Law Rev; 1984 May; 84(4):985-1031. PubMed ID: 11649964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical priority of patients' wishes.
Dickens BM
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposal for the use of advance directives in the treatment of incompetent mentally ill persons.
Brock DW
Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):247-56. PubMed ID: 11651538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
Bopp J; Avila D
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Competence to refuse medical treatment: autonomy vs. paternalism.
Annas GJ; Densberger JE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):561-96. PubMed ID: 11649779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. People with pipes: a question of euthanasia.
Machler S
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16(2):781-832. PubMed ID: 11659755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy.
Sabatino CP
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
