147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660622)
1. Hugh Finn's "right to die.
Paris JJ
America (NY); 1998 Oct; 179(13):13-5. PubMed ID: 11660622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Let my husband die": Michelle and Hugh Finn.
Casey K
Ladies Home J; 1999 Jul; 116(7):60, 62-64, 143. PubMed ID: 11658158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Family's life-and-death battle plays out in court.
Masters BA
Washington Post; 1998 Sep; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 11647591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Irish Supreme Court approves "right-to-die" case.
Wall M
Lancet; 1995 Aug; 346(8971):368. PubMed ID: 11644713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Appeal in Irish "right to die" case.
Wall M
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8960):1296. PubMed ID: 11644689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What the Pennsylvania bishops really said (a reply to Rev. Richard A. McCormick, S.J.
McMahon KT
Linacre Q; 1992 Aug; 59(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 11651448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hugh Finn's feeding tube removed: Gilmore plans final appeal today to keep newscaster alive.
Masters BA; Melton RH
Washington Post; 1998 Oct; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 15838955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Catholicism and the "right" to die.
Grondelski JM
Linacre Q; 1992 Nov; 59(4):50-6. PubMed ID: 11651443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Helpful analysis of statement on nutrition and hydration.
Neale A
Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(7):8. PubMed ID: 11645747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan.
Broder AJ; Cranford RE
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):787-832. PubMed ID: 11654371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Chicago opinion of marginal value.
Parnisari EP
Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Should Paul Brophy have been allowed to die?
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):324-325, 332. PubMed ID: 11658771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it wrong to cut off feeding?
Ostling RN
Time; 1987 Feb; 129(8):71. PubMed ID: 11653762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The care and treatment of the terminally ill: questions raised by McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc.
Peters EA
Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):543-50. PubMed ID: 11650429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Catholic tradition on the use of nutrition and fluids.
Paris JJ; McCormick RA
America (NY); 1987 May; 156(17):356-61. PubMed ID: 11658928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11656729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
