385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660637)
1. Politicians squabble over stem-cell research.
Rovner J
Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1948. PubMed ID: 11660637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendation is near on embryo cell research: ethics panel expected to urge end to ban.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinton asks study of bid to form part-human, part-cow cells.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Nov; ():31. PubMed ID: 11648079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advisory panel votes for use of embryonic cells in research.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jun; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11648123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
Cannon J; Haas M
Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The policy and politics of embryonic stem cell research.
Doerflinger R
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 12854534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cell research and the role of the new President's Council on Bioethics.
Cohen CB
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 12085946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research on embryonic tissue, ethics, and congressional inquiry.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):6. PubMed ID: 11657559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ninety-day wonder.
Haglund K
J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):10. PubMed ID: 11656639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Government says ban on human embryo research does not apply to cells.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jan; ():A29. PubMed ID: 11648094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Administrative developments: NIH backs federal funding for stem cell research.
Biven M
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 11657149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel.
Green RM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Mar; 5(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 11645298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryo research.
Lynch R;
Origins; 1994 Dec; 24(27):462. PubMed ID: 11659915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Federal policy toward human embryonic stem cell research.
Childress JF
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 12085940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New watchdogs in Washington.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):5. PubMed ID: 11643109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. All clones are not the same.
Gazzaniga M
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A33. PubMed ID: 16502528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Federal agency can still appoint special ethics advisory boards.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):6. PubMed ID: 11659880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commission on cloning: ready-made controversy.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
