BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660657)

  • 1. Withholding or withdrawing life support for newborns: today's ethical problem in neonatology.
    Nicolopoulos DA
    Prenat Neonatal Med; 1998 Jun; 3(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 11660657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
    Rhoden NK
    South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal and ethical issues concerning treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Johnson V
    Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 30(4):925-51. PubMed ID: 11651874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical considerations in surgery of the newborn.
    Contemp Surg; 1975 Dec; 7(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 11664702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
    Jakobovits Y
    Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
    Portela C
    Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The A.M.A. statement on tube feeding: an ethical analysis.
    O'Rourke K
    America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):321-323,331. PubMed ID: 11658770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing suffering and ensuring beneficial outcomes for neonates: an ethical perspective.
    Brodeur D
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11653274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Basto P
    Bioethics Forum; 1993; 9(4):22-7. PubMed ID: 11652268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preserving the life of children.
    Louisiana
    Revis Statut La; 1982; Title 40 Sections 1299.36.1 to 1299.36.3():. PubMed ID: 12041499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
    Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
    Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
    Keyserlingk EW
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
    White PD
    Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
    Crossley MA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Euthanasia.
    Williams G
    Med Leg J; 1973; 41(Part 1):14-34. PubMed ID: 11664249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.