These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660669)
1. Sophie's choices: medical and legal responses to suffering. Shepherd L Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 72(1):103-56. PubMed ID: 11660669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy. Addlestone SI Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Looking for a nonlegal process: physician-assisted suicide and the care perspective. Zwier PJ Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):199-248. PubMed ID: 11656853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does pro-choice mean pro-Kevorkian? An essay on Roe, Casey, and the right to die. Kreimer SF Am Univ Law Rev; 1995 Feb; 44(3):803-54. PubMed ID: 11660036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada? Carnerie F McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting parents' freedom to have children with genetic differences. Shepherd L Univ Ill Law Rev; 1995; 4():761-812. PubMed ID: 11658115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HIV disease: criminal and civil liability for assisted suicide. McCoy AG Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1991; 21(1):437-85. PubMed ID: 11659852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond theological conflict in the courts: the issue of assisted suicide. Dyck AJ Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):503-35. PubMed ID: 11653003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients. Cantor NL Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rejection of extraordinary medical care by a terminal patient: a proposed living will statute. Freeman J Iowa Law Rev; 1979 Mar; 64(3):573-658. PubMed ID: 11665074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma. Peterson GW Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach. Beschle DL Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):367-405. PubMed ID: 11653000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Suicide and assisting suicide: a critique of legal sanctions. Engelhardt HT; Malloy M Southwest Law J; 1982 Nov; 36(4):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11658640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. To die with dignity: comparing physician assisted suicide in the United States, Japan, and the Netherlands. Hall AC Wash Univ Law Q; 1996; 74(3):803-40. PubMed ID: 11660537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "Right to die" -- good slogan, fuzzy thinking. Kamisar Y First Things; 1993 Dec; 38():6-9. PubMed ID: 11654085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Euthanasia and law reform. Samek R Ottawa Law Rev; 1984; 17(1):86-115. PubMed ID: 11649198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Active euthanasia: can it be justified? Molenda FA Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Wrongful life and the comparison of harms. Perry C Westminst Inst Rev; 1982 Apr; 1(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 11650539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]