These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660684)
1. New Zealand court allows national blood samples to be used in civil trial. Coney S Lancet; 1999 Aug; 354(9180):753. PubMed ID: 11660684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Two marines who refused to comply with genetic-testing order face a court-martial. Lewis NA N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy? Yee YH Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing. Burk DL; Hess JA Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandatory testing of pregnant women: a strategy for challenging the law. Cooper EB AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Aug; Bonus Report():1-2. PubMed ID: 11660351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State v. Olivas. Washington. Supreme Court Pac Rep Second Ser; 1993 Aug; 856():1076-94. PubMed ID: 12041122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings. Moss KL Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners. Love SH Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA data banking: the dangerous erosion of privacy. Shapiro ED; Weinberg ML Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(3):455-86. PubMed ID: 11651144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Convict DNA bank unconstitutional? Science; 1998 Aug; 281(5380):1121. PubMed ID: 11645093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Giuliani backs DNA testing of newborns for identification. Lambert B N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():B4. PubMed ID: 11647658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Newborn genetic screening: ethical and social considerations for the nineties. Laberge CM; Knoppers BM J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11651052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Department of Defense DNA registry raises legal, ethical issues. Mnookin S Genewatch; 1996 Aug; 10(1):1, 3, 11. PubMed ID: 11656662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Jones v. Murray. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Apr; 962():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The right of minors to confidential access to contraceptives. Morano AL Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):214-40. PubMed ID: 11658598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA testing proposals. N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():A32. PubMed ID: 11647657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination. Baumann TK Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A legal research agenda for the Human Genome Initiative. Karjala DS Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):121-222. PubMed ID: 11659417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power. Paul EW; Klassel D Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]